Bug#856640: unblock: suricata/3.2.1-1

[Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>]

Hi Adam,

On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 11:56:23AM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 10:55 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Then it should not be in a stable release, but updated via stretch-updates.
> 
> That's self-contradictory. -updates is a subset of proposed-updates, so
> any packages released via it are necessarily in stable.

Not Moritz here, but maybe we can argue that way: It could be handled
like clamav (and be updated to upstream point updates via
stretch-updates), or possibly suricata should not be at all in a
stable release beeing to fast moving target[*].

 [*] it might get an excpetion of beeing maintained in backports even
 though it would not be in testing, like done for linux-grsec).

Thoughs?

Regards,
Salvatore