[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#839869: marked as done (transition: poppler 0.48.0)

Your message dated Sat, 3 Dec 2016 01:41:06 +0100
with message-id <f6af0d7f-e0eb-5805-85d5-07e2dd2cbad1@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#839869: transition: poppler 0.48.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #839869,
regarding transition: poppler 0.48.0
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
839869: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839869
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.48.0 transition.
Poppler 0.48.0 is hopefully going to be released this month, so it will
be uploaded to experimental first, as usual.

This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways:
- libpoppler61 → libpoppler64
- libpoppler-glib8 -- BC with 0.44 (one new symbol)
- libpoppler-qt4-4 -- BC with 0.44 (few new symbols)
- libpoppler-qt5-1 -- BC with 0.44 (few new symbols)

Below it is a list of sources which are touched by the transition:

  boomaga
  calligra
  cups-filters
  emacs-pdf-tools
  gambas3
  gdal
  gdcm
  inkscape
  ipe-tools
  pdf2djvu
  pdf2htmlex
  popplerkit.framework
  texlive-bin
  texworks
  xpdf

I haven't tested them yet with versions > 0.44, although it seems there
should not be distruptive enough changes to the API of the private
libpoppler. I will deal with the failures anyway (as I have done in
the past).

Other cases:

* derivations
    This source builds a libpoppler-based utility application which is
    only used during the build to generate other data, and no trace of
    that application are left in the resulting arch:all package.

Ben file:

title = "poppler 0.48.0";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libpoppler61" | .depends ~ "libpoppler64";
is_good = .depends ~ "libpoppler64";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libpoppler61";

Thanks,
-- 
Pino

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 05/11/16 12:56, Pino Toscano wrote:
> In data venerdì 4 novembre 2016 23:56:44 CET, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
>> On 31/10/16 08:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 31/10/16 07:57, Pino Toscano wrote:
>>>> In data giovedì 20 ottobre 2016 13:49:55 CET, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
>>>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>>>>
>>>>> On 18/10/16 23:30, Pino Toscano wrote:
>>>>>> In data lunedì 17 ottobre 2016 21:11:00 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
>>>>>>> On 08/10/16 20:34, Pino Toscano wrote:
>>>>>>>> In data giovedì 6 ottobre 2016 10:25:57 CEST, Rene Engelhard ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 10:13:14PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways:
>>>>>>>>>> - libpoppler61 → libpoppler64
>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>   boomaga
>>>>>>>>>>   calligra
>>>>>>>>>>   cups-filters
>>>>>>>>>>   emacs-pdf-tools
>>>>>>>>>>   gambas3
>>>>>>>>>>   gdal
>>>>>>>>>>   gdcm
>>>>>>>>>>   inkscape
>>>>>>>>>>   ipe-tools
>>>>>>>>>>   pdf2djvu
>>>>>>>>>>   pdf2htmlex
>>>>>>>>>>   popplerkit.framework
>>>>>>>>>>   texlive-bin
>>>>>>>>>>   texworks
>>>>>>>>>>   xpdf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I believe there's stuff missing there for whatever reason. E.g. libreoffice
>>>>>>>>> (via libreoffice-pdfimport, https://packages.debian.org/sid/libreoffice-pdfimport).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Was in your last transition bugs afaicr, so I wonder what went wrong this time ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh right, sorry, it was indeed missing.  In the above list there is also:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   libreoffice
>>>>>>>>   openscenegraph
>>>>>>>>   openscenegraph-3.4
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see the new poppler is now in experimental. Do the rdeps build against the new
>>>>>>> version?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I could test everything but LibreOffice: no failures.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rene, could you please give LO + poppler/experimental a try? Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Rene told me LO is fine. Please go ahead.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the late reply -- I was busy and thus I couldn't dedicate the
>>>> proper time to follow the transition.
>>>>
>>>> Is the slot for this transtition still open, or should I wait for any
>>>> other in progress transitions?
>>>
>>> Let's wait for the gdal transition to finish. Thanks for checking first.
>>
>> gdal is done. Let's do this.
> 
> Thanks! Uploaded few hours ago, and at this point built and uploaded on
> all the release architectures (and not only those).

libreoffice just went in, finishing this transition.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: