Re: nspr transition to testing
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 07:46:58 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 07:24:00AM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Mike Hommey:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Why has nspr been a valid candidate for testing migration for several
> > > weeks or months without it happening?
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Britney believes migrating nspr will break libnspr4-0d in testing.
> > Which is technically true as libsnpr4-0d has a strictly equal dependency
> > on libsnpr4. Normally she should remove libnspr4-0d as she migrates
> > nspr to testing, but for some reason she doesn't in this case.
> >
> > It wasn't entirely obvious to me in the 5 minutes I had time to debug
> > it. AFAICT, nothing depends on libsnpr4-0d in testing, so at first
> > glance, she should just throw it out.
>
> Who should I bug for something to happen, presumably manually since it's
> not happening automatically? ftp-masters?
>
I've forced migration a few days ago. I guess you could file a bug
against release.d.o with the britney usertag to record this and
hopefully it'll get looked at, but in the mean time the immediate
problem should be gone.
Cheers,
Julien
Reply to: