Hi Emilio, On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 11:49:19PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Do you mean that it should depend on qtbase-abi-5-x-y? > > > > If yes, I would like this to be the case, but as it is a plugin which just > > implements the QPlatformTheme interface, and it does not use any Qt private > > symbols. And as there are no private symbols on it, it does not get such a > > dependency. > > > > In this particular case, a new method was added to its (pure virtual) parent > > class (with the default implementation), and the rebuild makes sure that > > this method can be called. > > I mean if changes in qtbase can break this package, then it probably needs a > stricter dependency than it currently has. But maybe it's qtbase's fault for > breaking the public ABI (if that is considered an ABI break. I'm not too > familiar with C++ ABI so I can't say). But I'll just leave this up to you. It is not public ABI. Note that both plasma-integration and lxqt-qtplugin build-depend on qtbase5-*private*-dev. -- Dmitry Shachnev
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature