Bug#843051: release.debian.org: boost1.62 transition
Control: retitle -1 transition: boost1.62
Control: user release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 transition
Control: block -1 by 842927
On 11/03/2016 01:53 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
Please use reportbug in the future to have it set the appropriate usertag.
> boost-defaults has already been accepted to effectively start the
> boost1.62 transition. Quite speedy NEW queue processing there.
>
> smr and I, debate taking boost1.62 transition because it is a relatively
> small jump; and there are openssl fixes. (boost doesn't directly link
> against openssl, but the exposed templates do use openssl, thus boost is
> entagled transitively into openssl transition for packages that use
> relevant boost templates).
>
> The rebuild results look ok:
> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/boost1.62.html
>
> Whilst this is Ubuntu transition tracker, many results are transferable,
> as it covers 6 out 10 release architecutres. There are a few packages in
> Ubuntu that are not in Debian Testing, thus I expect binNMUs to behave
> better in Debian. And I commit to fixing outstanding packages to the
> best of my ability to complete this transition swiftly.
#842927 likely affects more python packages that build-depend on
libboost-python-dev. That should be fixed before the binNMUs cause all
those packages to FTBFS.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Reply to: