[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#801405: marked as done (wheezy-pu: package firebug/2.0.4-1~deb7u1)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2016 14:22:42 +0100
with message-id <1459603362.2441.217.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Fix included in oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #801405,
regarding wheezy-pu: package firebug/2.0.4-1~deb7u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
801405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801405
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

We’ve just noticed that xul-ext-firebug is totally broken in Wheezy (it
doesn’t even start), probably due to a recent update of Iceweasel via a
DSA. I propose to rebuild the version currently (working) in Jessie for
Wheezy, even if the debdiff is once again insane (979 files changed,
169763 insertions(+), 58142 deletions(-), so I will spare you the
details if that’s OK…).

The new changelog entry, compared to the package currently in Jessie, is:


firebug (2.0.4-1~deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=medium

  * Upload compatible version with recent Iceweasel in Wheezy

 -- David Prévot <taffit@debian.org>  Fri, 09 Oct 2015 13:32:44 -0400


Thanks in advance for considering it.

Regards

David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 7.10

Hi,

The updates referenced in these bugs were included in today's wheezy
point release.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: