On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 18:37:12 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Find attached a proposed patch to build both guile-gnutls and > gnutls-bin from gnutls26 instead of gnutls28 for wheezy. Would this be > acceptable for an unstable upload targeted for testing? Afterwards > gnutls28 could be pulled from wheezy. > Is there a particular reason we need to ship guile-gnutls? It appears to have 0 reverse dependency... Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature