Your message dated Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:58:30 +0200 with message-id <20120623135830.GN5628@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#675890: transition: owfs has caused the Debian Bug report #675890, regarding transition: owfs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 675890: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675890 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: owfs
- From: Vincent Danjean <vdanjean@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:02:36 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120603230236.27994.430.reportbug@eyak.imag.fr>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, I would like to upload the new release of owfs. As always for this software, upstream does not really take care of symbols (some are removed) but they always bump the soname, so there should not be any problems with other programs. owfs provides three library packages, currently libow-2.8-14 libowcapi-2.8-14 libownet-2.8-14 and next will be -15. Note that all reverse-dependencies are package built from owfs itself (same source package) so the upload of this new upstream version should not change anything for the rest of the Debian archive. Is it ok for me to upload the new release? (and do I need to fill such a bug when all reverse dependencies are in the same source package?) Regards, Vincent -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.3.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Vincent Danjean <vdanjean@debian.org>, 675890-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#675890: transition: owfs
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:58:30 +0200
- Message-id: <20120623135830.GN5628@radis.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120603230236.27994.430.reportbug@eyak.imag.fr>
- References: <[🔎] 20120603230236.27994.430.reportbug@eyak.imag.fr>
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 01:02:36 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi, > > I would like to upload the new release of owfs. As always for > this software, upstream does not really take care of symbols (some > are removed) but they always bump the soname, so there should not be any > problems with other programs. > owfs provides three library packages, currently libow-2.8-14 > libowcapi-2.8-14 libownet-2.8-14 and next will be -15. > Note that all reverse-dependencies are package built from owfs itself (same > source package) so the upload of this new upstream version should not change > anything for the rest of the Debian archive. > This seems to be all done. Closing. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---