On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:21:36PM +0000, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:55:29PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > rebuilding Boost as-is would require a new Boost transition. > > Why would that be? gcc-4.1 and gcc-4.2 are supposed to be fully > ABI-compatible. Because boost upstream encodes all the things they use to build it in their soname or whatever, making it ABI incompatible ? And I'm sure they're proud of it to boo(s)t. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpCIAbnaBcMx.pgp
Description: PGP signature