Re: Two other packages are now failing their debci tests on i386 (Was: Bug#1024012: [joshuaulrich/xts] Unit test failure when running on i386 (Issue #384))
Hi Andreas,
I already noticed.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 06:11:53PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> According to tracker[1] there are now r-cran-bbmle[2] failing with
>
> --- profbound.Rout.save_ 2023-01-22 11:28:41.154493354 +0000
> +++ profbound.Rout_ 2023-01-22 11:28:41.158493203 +0000
> @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
> + method="L-BFGS-B")
> >
> > pp <- profile(fit2,prof.lower=-0.2)
> +Warning message:
> +In mle2(minuslogl = function (a = NULL, b = NULL) :
> + convergence failure: code=52 (ERROR: ABNORMAL_TERMINATION_IN_LNSRCH)
> > stopifnot(min(subset(as.data.frame(pp),param=="b")$par.vals.b)==-0.2)
> > ## note that b does go below -0.2 when profiling a ...
> > options(old_opt)
I don't have a better idea for that than sending you a MR to disable
this test on i386.
Ubuntu has problems with a different test in this package on ppc64el
where they are building with -O3,[1] so this package seems to have
fragile tests.
> and r-cran-rpf[3] failing with
>
> ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
> ── Failure ('test-fit.R:116'): fit w/ mcar ─────────────────────────────────────
> `stat` not equal to `Estat`.
> 1/20 mismatches
> [5] 4.42 - 6.69 == -2.27
>
> [ FAIL 1 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 381 ]
>
> I have no idea what to do sensibly (except patching out the said tests).
This might end up being similar, but there is some weirdness going on here.
I'll let you know if patching is needed.
> Kind regards
> Andreas.
>...
cu
Adrian
[1] https://patches.ubuntu.com/r/r-cran-bbmle/r-cran-bbmle_1.0.25-1ubuntu1.patch
Reply to: