Bug#1034796: kio-gdrive: Does not work. Network account create does not propose gogle drive
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Justification: Package is not unusable for everyone. See the following
for further info: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
Reply follows inline:
Eric Valette <eric.valette@free.fr> writes:
> Using dolphin for network, you can select gdrive but it does not propose to add
> a google account.
>
That's odd, mine shows a "New account" button.
> Using systemsettings, I have the same problem and using the command rpoposed in the
> packahe readme.md gives:
> kioclient5 exec gdrive:/
> kf.service.services: KApplicationTrader: mimeType "x-scheme-handler/gdrive" not found
> kf.kio.core: KIO::get didn't emit a mimetype! Please fix the KIO worker for URL QUrl("gdrive:/")
>
Hmm, that sounds like the KIO worker wasn't registered properly. I'll
assume you ran "kdeinit5 # or just [logout and] re-login" as stated in
the README. Assuming this was the case indicates some kind of breakage
elsewhere.
> Kernel: Linux 5.15.108 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Neat, I track this branch too :)
> Versions of packages kio-gdrive depends on:
> ii kaccounts-integration 4:22.12.3-1
> ii kio 5.104.0-1
Are you able to reproduce this bug with a pure testing/bookworm or
sid/unstable system? If so, please provide steps to reproduce, and
remove the moreinfo tag from this bug at that time.
Assuming the README was followed, it appears that the trigger condition
is kio (or another package) from experimental. I wonder if the ABI was
silently broken by upstream again, and that's what's going on here? If
you'd like to test this hypothesis, try downloading the source package
for kio-gdrive, install the *-dev packages for the versions of the
libraries you're using on this installation, then dpkg-buildpackage,
debuild, or similar, as you prefer.
Alternatively, I wonder if this is a wishlist bug expressing how
annoying it is to have to "kdeinit5 # or just [logout and] re-login"? I
would totally relate, by the way, because I find that annoying too.
Regards,
Nicholas
Reply to: