[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#898191: marked as done (sddm: Does not honor PAM's ambient supplemental groups (via e.g. pam_group.so))

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jul 2018 17:29:46 +0200
with message-id <[🔎] 20180722152946.GA16801@eldamar.local>
and subject line Re: Bug#898191: sddm: Does not honor PAM's ambient supplemental groups (via e.g. pam_group.so)
has caused the Debian Bug report #898191,
regarding sddm: Does not honor PAM's ambient supplemental groups (via e.g. pam_group.so)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
898191: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898191
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sddm
Version: 0.14.0-4
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Forwarded: https://github.com/sddm/sddm/pull/834

Hi

In sddm setups where the sddm pam configuration is configured to use
pam_group to add additional groups on login depending on the
/etc/security/group.conf configuration does not work. This was as well
reported upstream as https://github.com/sddm/sddm/pull/834 .

Upstream fix
https://github.com/sddm/sddm/commit/1bc813d08b8130e458a6550ec47fb2bfbe6de080

Note, similar configuration worked with kdm under Jessie, so such
setups are suffering from a slight regression when updating from
Jessie to Stretch with kdm (respective later sddm) using pam_group
setup.

Could you consider to update it in unstable and possibly via point
release in stretch? I would be happy to test any backported fix.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: sddm
Source-Version: 0.18.0-1

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:14:26PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Package: sddm
> Version: 0.14.0-4
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
> Forwarded: https://github.com/sddm/sddm/pull/834
> 
> Hi
> 
> In sddm setups where the sddm pam configuration is configured to use
> pam_group to add additional groups on login depending on the
> /etc/security/group.conf configuration does not work. This was as well
> reported upstream as https://github.com/sddm/sddm/pull/834 .
> 
> Upstream fix
> https://github.com/sddm/sddm/commit/1bc813d08b8130e458a6550ec47fb2bfbe6de080
> 
> Note, similar configuration worked with kdm under Jessie, so such
> setups are suffering from a slight regression when updating from
> Jessie to Stretch with kdm (respective later sddm) using pam_group
> setup.
> 
> Could you consider to update it in unstable and possibly via point
> release in stretch? I would be happy to test any backported fix.

This now has been fixed in 0.18.0-1 as uploaded in unstable.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---
Reply to: