On Saturday 06 February 2016 21:03:05 Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Saturday 06 February 2016 14:35:56 Scott Kitterman wrote: > > >Maybe the 'issue' is that libindi is the source package name? > > >Another explanation could be that there is a version 0.9.7-1 for > > >libindi0b and libindi-dev on hurd-i386. > > > > That would do it. You might want to file a architecture specific RM bug > > to > > clear it up. > > I don't even have a remote clue how to go about that and against which > package, so I'll leave that up to others who do understand that. Take a look at <https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals> and then use reportbug against ftp.debian.org, as version 0.9.7-1 is in unstable as rmadison outputs: $ rmadison libindi libindi | 0.9.1-2 | oldstable | source libindi | 0.9.7-1 | unstable | source libindi | 0.9.8.1-5.1 | stable | source libindi | 0.9.8.1-5.1 | stable-kfreebsd | source libindi | 1.0.0-4 | unstable | source libindi | 1.1.0-1 | testing | source libindi | 1.1.0-1 | unstable | source Feel free to send me a copy of the bug so I can track it (reportbug will ask you if you want to send copies). Happy hacking! -- I am two fools, I know, for loving, and for saying so. John Donne Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.