Bug#732468: dolphin: Show in groups ordered by tag stopped working
Package: dolphin
Version: 4:4.11.3-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Doplhin had a great feature where you could view a folder in groups based
on associated tags that were assigned to each file. It lead to a column
based view were the title of each column was the tag name. This was an
excellent feature to taxinomise different files based on other
characteristics.
This now has stopped working.
I go to a folder which contains files associated with more than one tags,
I set "show in groups" option and order by "Tags" and column view (middle
icon). The outcome is a regular list of files not taking into account the
"show in groups" or order by "tags".
The outcome should be a column based folder view with column title the tag
name and the list of files associated with that tag.
Thank you.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=el_GR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=el_GR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages dolphin depends on:
ii kde-runtime 4:4.11.3-1
ii libc6 2.17-97
ii libgcc1 1:4.8.2-1
ii libkactivities6 4:4.11.3-1
ii libkcmutils4 4:4.11.3-2
ii libkdecore5 4:4.11.3-2
ii libkdeui5 4:4.11.3-2
ii libkfile4 4:4.11.3-2
ii libkio5 4:4.11.3-2
ii libknewstuff3-4 4:4.11.3-2
ii libkonq5abi1 4:4.11.3-1
ii libkparts4 4:4.11.3-2
ii libnepomukcore4 4:4.11.3-1
ii libnepomukwidgets4abi1 4:4.11.3-1
ii libphonon4 4:4.7.0.0-2
ii libplasma3 4:4.11.3-2
ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2
ii libqt4-xml 4:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2
ii libqtcore4 4:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2
ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2
ii libsolid4 4:4.11.3-2
ii libsoprano4 2.9.4+dfsg-1
ii libstdc++6 4.8.2-1
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.8-1
ii phonon 4:4.7.0.0-2
Versions of packages dolphin recommends:
pn ruby <none>
Versions of packages dolphin suggests:
pn kdesdk-dolphin-plugins <none>
-- no debconf information
Reply to: