Bug#1064951: marked as done (UDD/upload_history: importer broken by switch to detached PGP signatures)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:44:52 +0100
with message-id <ZeC0hN6CcLqlP2O7@grub.nussbaum.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#1064951: UDD/upload_history: importer broken by switch to detached PGP signatures
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064951,
regarding UDD/upload_history: importer broken by switch to detached PGP signatures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1064951: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064951
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
The upload_history importer parses email received by the
debian-devel-changes mailing list. On 2024-02-11, the format of those
emails changed to multipart/signed. Previously the PGP signature was
inlined.
The script that parses the email archives to generate a simpler deb822
summary needs to be adapted. See
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/scripts/upload_history_extractor.py?ref_type=heads#L63
Help is very much welcomed to fix that -- I don't know when I'll be able
to work on it myself.
Lucas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 28/02/24 at 13:42 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi Ansgar,
>
> On 28/02/24 at 08:51 +0100, Ansgar 🙀 wrote:
> > Hi Lucas,
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:30:28 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > The upload_history importer parses email received by the
> > > debian-devel-changes mailing list. On 2024-02-11, the format of those
> > > emails changed to multipart/signed. Previously the PGP signature was
> > > inlined.
> >
> > This isn't correct: the mails themselves were not signed previously,
> > but contained a inlined-signed part (the .changes signed by the
> > uploader), but that wasn't the full mail.
> >
> Right. Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> > Now the mail also has a signature from the archive software, but the
> > importer could just ignore the outer signature and process the inner
> > part in the same way as before.
>
> I'll do just that (and fix other email-parsing issues at the same time)
Done!
Lucas
--- End Message ---
Reply to: