Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:08:15 +0200 with message-id <20060412130815.GA16201@df7cb.de> and subject line qa.debian.org: please create a new category for (pending) NMU by foo@debian.org has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: qa.debian.org: please create a new category for (pending) NMU by foo@debian.org
- From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:40:04 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20060411084004.8709.96599.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Tags: ddpo It'd be great if the sections "(pending) uploads by foo@debian.org" were splitted between uploads and "(pending) NMU by foo@debian.org". Other uploads are mostly presumably sponsoring tasks, and having them mixed with a one time NMU is not optimal. thanks for the really useful tool that DDPO is btw !
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 361920-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: qa.debian.org: please create a new category for (pending) NMU by foo@debian.org
- From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:08:15 +0200
- Message-id: <20060412130815.GA16201@df7cb.de>
- Mail-followup-to: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>, 361920-done@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060411084004.8709.96599.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
- References: <[🔎] 20060411084004.8709.96599.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
Re: Pierre Habouzit 2006-04-11 <[🔎] 20060411084004.8709.96599.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> > It'd be great if the sections "(pending) uploads by foo@debian.org" were splitted > between uploads and "(pending) NMU by foo@debian.org". Other uploads are > mostly presumably sponsoring tasks, and having them mixed with a one time > NMU is not optimal. Hi Pierre, thanks for the suggestion. I've split up the "Uploads" section into NMU/sponsored/QA sections. I didn't split the "Pending uploads" since I don't think such a fine-grained separation makes sense for the "average" DD. (I see that you have 19 packages in there at the moment, but this resolves itself once the delayed queue is flushed.) Christoph -- cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---