[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#444327: marked as done (shouldn't xsupplicant say wpasupplicant is more appropriate?)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:18:49 -0500
with message-id <20080826201848.GA20427@sym-link.com>
and subject line xsupplicant removed from the archive
has caused the Debian Bug report #444327,
regarding shouldn't xsupplicant say wpasupplicant is more appropriate?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
444327: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=444327
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: xsupplicant
Version: 1.2.4.dfsg.1-3

Shouldn't the xsupplicant package description say you'd be better with
wpasupplicant? for people who're searching for an appropriate package.

Pete Boyd

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
xsupplicant has been removed from Debian[1], therefore I am closing
this bug report.

Thanks,

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483627

-- 
Eric Evans
eevans@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: