Bug#106513: marked as done (secpanel is not working while scp'ing)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Jul 2002 16:22:38 -0400
with message-id <E17RIYI-0006pG-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#106513: fixed in secpanel 0.32-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2001 04:11:01 +0000
>From kov@zaz.com.br Tue Jul 24 23:11:01 2001
Return-path: <kov@zaz.com.br>
Received: from dl-tnt2-c8c0bd78.bhz.terra.com.br (couve) [::ffff:200.192.189.120]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15PG0d-0006S9-00; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:11:00 -0500
Received: by zaz.com.br
via sendmail from stdin
id <m15PG46-002bWXC@couve> (Debian Smail3.2.0.111)
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 01:14:30 -0300 (BRT)
Message-Id: <m15PG46-002bWXC@couve>
From: Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: secpanel is not working while scp'ing
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.21
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.21
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 01:14:29 -0300
Bcc:
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: secpanel
Version: 0.31-1
Severity: normal
Hi Pablo ;)
I think I should set this bug's priority to important but, well...
While in secpanel, in the scp panel, I tried to use my sourceforge
connection to send a file... then it opened my xterm and showed:
SecPanel ListServer
In this shell we get a connection for establishing
a graphical file listing.
---------------------------------------------------------
(and after a while:)
bash: tcl: command not found
---------- SecPanel ----------
Connection closed
Press <Return> to continue...
thanks =)
[]s!
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux couve 2.4.6 #1 Qui Jul 19 03:19:55 BRT 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR
Versions of packages secpanel depends on:
ii ssh 1:2.9p2-4 Secure rlogin/rsh/rcp replacement
ii tcl8.0 [tclsh] 8.0.5-6 The Tool Command Language (TCL) v8
ii tcl8.3 [tclsh] 8.3.2-11 The Tool Command Language (TCL) v8
ii tk8.0 [wish] 8.0.5-7 The Tk toolkit for TCL and X11 v8.
ii tk8.3 [wish] 8.3.2-5 The Tk toolkit for TCL and X11 v8.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 106513-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jul 2002 20:38:20 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Sun Jul 07 15:38:20 2002
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17RInU-0004Xh-00; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 15:38:20 -0500
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17RIYI-0006pG-00; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 16:22:38 -0400
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 106513-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.17 $
Subject: Bug#106513: fixed in secpanel 0.32-1
Message-Id: <E17RIYI-0006pG-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 16:22:38 -0400
Delivered-To: 106513-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
secpanel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
secpanel_0.32-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.32-1.diff.gz
secpanel_0.32-1.dsc
to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.32-1.dsc
secpanel_0.32-1_all.deb
to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.32-1_all.deb
secpanel_0.32.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.32.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 106513@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <vela@debian.org> (supplier of updated secpanel package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 00:17:30 +0200
Source: secpanel
Binary: secpanel
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.32-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
Description:
secpanel - A Tcl/Tk GUI for SSH and SCP.
Closes: 106513 132463 144222
Changes:
secpanel (0.32-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload.
* New upstream version:
- listserver.tcl looks for tclsh as well. Closes: #106513, #144222.
- Handles filenames containing spaces. Closes: #132463.
* listserver.tcl: Use portable shell code for finding tclsh.
* gui.tcl: This file is not meant to be executed, so placate Lintian by
removing the shebang.
* Moved architecture-independent files to /usr/share/secpanel.
* Changed section to net since ssh is no longer in non-US.
* debian/secpanel.1: Say something actually useful, even if that means
quoting the README.
* debian/copyright: New upstream URL.
* debian/changelog: Remove obsolete Emacs local variables.
Files:
3877f27f5cead6dae5318e3f7807d4da 563 net optional secpanel_0.32-1.dsc
c473552dc84ca4d21e1753d1cc8eb9d8 45783 net optional secpanel_0.32.orig.tar.gz
36cb9e466f80a7d0dcc18afab54de637 2925 net optional secpanel_0.32-1.diff.gz
677523b048d168b8a390393cd1111212 41378 net optional secpanel_0.32-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9H4OKxBYivKllgY8RAhC7AKCLgSHmLD0zV/yBsFXBf2m7ed2R3ACfX+Yj
x5EXOwH5/RfopuzYoTpqzs0=
=RV95
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: