Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:21:38AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 11/22/22 17:59, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > > Or should we mark them as X-Python3-Version: << 3.11 so they can stay in
> > > > testing as long as Python 3.10 is the default?
> > >
> > > I don't think this is the way.
> >
> > I'm sorry, I don't understand - which is not the way?
>
> I don't think you should "mark them as X-Python3-Version: << 3.11", because
> either we use 3.10 or 3.11 in Bookworm, I don't think that there's a plan
> for having both interpreters available.
It's more about the present time: if I mark them as << 3.11, then they
will build fine and be able to stay in testing. If I don't, they'll
be pulled from testing in the next few weeks because of FTBFS bugs.
Obviously, once they do build OK with 3.11, then I can remove that
clause.
Best wishes,
Julian
Reply to: