Re: GnuPG signatures on PyPI: why so few?

To: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: GnuPG signatures on PyPI: why so few?
From: Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 22:37:12 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 103B2EC3-2E7F-4E1A-913B-B92BB2A916D8@stufft.io>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAKTje6G_g881+eksOTzcvQXCd88fVSpRUvkdYbE02JQiDpYxcA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 85r323gw48.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <[🔎] 20170312202807.GP12827@yuggoth.org> <[🔎] CAKTje6G_g881+eksOTzcvQXCd88fVSpRUvkdYbE02JQiDpYxcA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mar 12, 2017, at 10:35 PM, Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> wrote:

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:

upload them to PyPI since the authors of the coming Warehouse
replacement for the current CheeseShop PyPI have already indicated
that they intend to drop support for signatures entirely.

Did they give any reasoning for this decision?

https://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2016-May/028933.html

—
Donald Stufft

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GnuPG signatures on PyPI: why so few?
  - From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
- Re: GnuPG signatures on PyPI: why so few?
  - From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at>

References:
- GnuPG signatures on PyPI: why so few?
  - From: Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org>
- Re: GnuPG signatures on PyPI: why so few?
  - From: Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org>
- Re: GnuPG signatures on PyPI: why so few?
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: GnuPG signatures on PyPI: why so few?
Next by Date: Re: GnuPG signatures on PyPI: why so few?
Previous by thread: Re: GnuPG signatures on PyPI: why so few?
Next by thread: Re: GnuPG signatures on PyPI: why so few?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread