Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?
Am 20. November 2022 23:04:05 MEZ schrieb Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>:
>On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 10:45:15PM +0100, Michael Neuffer wrote:
>> On 11/20/22 22:14, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote:
>> > On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 21:42, G. Branden Robinson
>> > <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thank you for, perhaps inadvertently, compelling me to review some of
>> > > the content of the package. I can now say that I am certain there is
>> > > material of worth in the fortunes-off package and support its retention
>> > > in the Debian distribution. A review process for individual entries
>> > > that are incompatible with the project's values is manifest in the BTS.
>> > >
>> > rational approach vs cancel culture: 1 vs 0
>> > <3
>>
>> I can only very much agree to this.
>
>I also wholly agree, alas it seems we already lost before this even
>started :(
>
>https://tracker.debian.org/news/1385116/accepted-fortune-mod-11991-72-source-amd64-all-into-unstable/
>
As it was an NMU, this should be easily rectified.
Don't let cancel culture win.
Cheers
Mike
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Reply to: