On Vi, 14 ian 11, 08:56:16, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 03:20:37AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > and it's ok by Policy, then I'd be happy to apply a patch someone > > provides. :) > > Here is one. > Index: dep5.mdwn > =================================================================== > --- dep5.mdwn (revision 157) > +++ dep5.mdwn (working copy) > @@ -149,12 +149,14 @@ > will usually be written as a list of RFC5822 addresses or URIs. > > * **`Source`** > - * Required > + * Optional > * Syntax: formatted text, no synopsis > * An explanation from where the upstream source came from. > Typically this would be a URL, but it might be a free-form > explanation. If the upstream source has been modified to remove > - non-free parts, that should be explained in this field. > + non-free parts, that should be explained in this field. This field > + is mandatory for non-native Debian packages; it can be omitted for > + native Debian packages. > > * **`Disclaimer`** > * Optional Whatever the end result, IMVHO by putting the "mandatory" in the description it is quite likely that people will just not see it. I would suggest something like: "Required, except for Debian native packages" Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature