also sprach Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> [2009.11.18.1604 +0100]: > > To get the software into non-free, we'd need you to commit to > > security support of the stable version throughout the lifetime of > > our stable release. > > Not really: > http://www.debian.org/security/faq#contrib a requirement. The point I was trying to make instead of suggesting that security support was a requirement was that we should exercise care not to expose our users to the risk of potentially obtaining unsupported software from our archive. Yes, the security FAQ addresses the non-free issue. This doesn't make the situation any more desirable. At least not for me. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems the early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese in the trap.
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)