On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:13:51 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote: > > > I maintain the Ghostscript package, but am not skilled in the various > > > tools using Ghostscript. It seems more sensible to me to first > > > investigate toolchain problems further back in the chain, where (I > > > assume) it is better known how to isolate the data forwarded down the > > > chain. > > > > > > I guess this is what I did in previous message 33 ? > > Ohh, indeed! Great details and smells strongly of the bug being in > Ghostscript. I am hereby re-re-re-assigning and reviving versions... Dear submitter, Can you advise whether this is still an issue? I ran the attached foomatic file through gs on amd64 and it still works fine. But I have no access to an armel machine. Thanks, -Steve
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.