[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#815391: marked as done (Ghostscript 9.16 (debian stretch) not linked against libopenjpeg)



Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:42:58 +0100
with message-id <145604417804.19445.12665880721258447077@auryn.jones.dk>
and subject line Re: Bug#815391: Ghostscript 9.16 (debian stretch) not linked against libopenjpeg
has caused the Debian Bug report #815391,
regarding Ghostscript 9.16 (debian stretch) not linked against libopenjpeg
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
815391: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815391
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgs9
Version: 9.16~dfsg-2.1

When asked to perform any operation on a PDF containing JPEG2000 (/JPXDecode) images, Ghostscript displays the following:

$ gs -dBATCH -dQUIET -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=_.pdf anyjpeg2000.pdf  

   **** ERROR: Unable to process JPXDecode data. Page will be missing data.


Ghostscript will leave any JPX encoded images blank but still produce the rest of PDF output. Any PDF containing a JPX encoded image triggers this behavior.

I believe the issue is that this particular version of libgs9 and/or ghostscript was not built --with-jp2. The packages also do not list libopenjpeg as a dependency. Ghostscript has supported JPEG 2000 for a long time.

System: 
Linux 576f25bbd6dc 4.1.17-boot2docker #1 SMP Thu Feb 11 08:12:31 UTC 2016 x86_64 GNU/Linux, stretch/sid
built "FROM debian:stretch" on hub.docker.com.




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 9.18~dfsg-1

Quoting James R Barlow (2016-02-21 08:31:35)
> I believe the issue is that this particular version of libgs9 and/or 
> ghostscript was not built --with-jp2. The packages also do not list 
> libopenjpeg as a dependency. Ghostscript has supported JPEG 2000 for a 
> long time.

Correct.

This changed in 9.18~dfsg-1.

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: