On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 07:24:49PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 07:04:01PM +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: > > That's fine, but in that case this fact should be documented instead no? > > Right now there's confusion across the docs what criticality levels are > > available. Britney.conf and d-policy mention critical/emergency but nothing > > else even acknowledges they exist which is just confusing. > > I believe Debian policy should be changed then and not mention a severity > which is not used in practice. Easier said than done. I see debian-policy@d.o is already CCed on this bug so, opinions? Doesn't policy document the reality that these urgency values are in fact usable? Do you not agree that britney does in fact support these? If I go ahead and upload a package with urgency=critical will this be REJECTed by ftp-master? If not they exist so why shouldn't they be documented in devref? --Daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature