Bug#901160: Updating the description of the Standards-Version field

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#901160: Updating the description of the Standards-Version field"):
> ISTM that the status of the upgrading checklist is easier for package
> maintainers to understand if it continues to have no normative status at
> all.  It's a pure convenience.

Fine; I don't really care about this aspedct...

> Here is the patch for seconding:

Seconded, but:

> > +This information may be used to file bug reports automatically if your
> > +package becomes too much out of date.

Maybe this sentence should be removed from here, and added to the last
paragraph ("A very old ...") somewhere.  Or maybe, even, removed.  Do
we in fact file bugs automatically ?  I'm not aware of us doing so.

Thanks,
Ian.