On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:08:28 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > > i also prefer to keep it but maybe C::M could at least not add it if > > it's not there but keep it if it's there? > ok. that's what I'll implement except when debian/compat is '9'. In this case, > cme will "fix" debhelper dep so as to have debhelper >= 9 > Is this fine ? Sounds good to me, thanks! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature