[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#926318: marked as done (LibreOffice does not recognize new "Debian" JDK (openjdk 11 >= 11.0.3+4-2))



Your message dated Wed, 03 Apr 2019 16:53:52 +0000
with message-id <E1hBj96-000Ghx-UY@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#926318: fixed in libreoffice 1:6.1.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #926318,
regarding LibreOffice does not recognize new "Debian" JDK (openjdk 11 >= 11.0.3+4-2)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
926318: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926318
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openjdk-11, libreoffice
Control: found -1 openjdk-11/11.0.3+4-3
Control: found -1 libreoffice/1:6.1.5-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ci@lists.debian.org
User: debian-ci@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainers,

With a recent upload of openjdk-11 the autopkgtest of libreoffice fails
in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
openjdk-11 from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from
testing. In tabular form:
                       pass            fail
openjdk-11             from testing    11.0.3+4-3
libreoffice            from testing    1:6.1.5-1
all others             from testing    from testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of openjdk-11 to
testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report
against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and
reassign the bug to the right package? If needed, please change the
bug's severity.

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=openjdk-11

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/libr/libreoffice/2172984/log.gz

====== Add the extension ======
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
Please ensure that a JVM and the package libreoffice-java-common
is installed.
If it is already installed then try removing
~/.libreoffice/3/user/config/javasettings_Linux_*.xml
Synchronizing repository for shared extensions



 Synchronizing repository for bundled extensions



javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
Please ensure that a JVM and the package libreoffice-java-common
is installed.
If it is already installed then try removing
~/.libreoffice/3/user/config/javasettings_Linux_*.xml

ERROR: An error occurred while enabling: TestExtension.jar
       Cause:
(com.sun.star.registry.CannotRegisterImplementationException) { {
Message = "Could not create Java implementation loader", Context =
(com.sun.star.uno.XInterface) @0 } }

unopkg failed.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libreoffice
Source-Version: 1:6.1.5-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libreoffice, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 926318@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> (supplier of updated libreoffice package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 13:19:34 +0200
Source: libreoffice
Architecture: source
Version: 1:6.1.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian LibreOffice Maintainers <debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Closes: 926281 926318
Changes:
 libreoffice (1:6.1.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * debian/patches/mention-java-common-package.diff: update message to
     reflect current config dir...
   * debian/patches/java.vendor-Debian.diff: make jvmfwk recognize "Debian"
     as java.vendor as that's what is set in openjdk 11 >= 11.0.3+4-2
     - see #926009 (closes: #926318)
 .
   * debian/control.gtk3.in:
     - make libreoffice-gtk3 recommend gstreamer1.0-gtk3 (see LP: #1820062)
   * debian/rules:
     - remove i386 special-casing for openjdk-8 and -9 from old "stack clash
       fix broken on i386" days preventing removal openjdk-8
       (closes: #926281)
Checksums-Sha1:
 73d0d6db35b7b1abc3dfa7ac077c9d591c45e1a3 27719 libreoffice_6.1.5-2.dsc
 ad71bfc34b068d998c1e87c64efa8dc3bb545efa 9967236 libreoffice_6.1.5-2.debian.tar.xz
 c13e01ea3bfccc12712472a194c0dc1205f45c0e 42443 libreoffice_6.1.5-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 ba267f8cb1be01c3db114a2274aff1aad303748b74f77942d359e5dce042f87f 27719 libreoffice_6.1.5-2.dsc
 0531ebb402a798399cfe5f8133843d1019b12680eee535020e76c381091d3a0f 9967236 libreoffice_6.1.5-2.debian.tar.xz
 45586648d566fb7984d92b806f8e548022d3a3af46f800c5d53de8f92e444ddd 42443 libreoffice_6.1.5-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 c39173db4e7d7b3e6b26771ef4b0f32b 27719 editors optional libreoffice_6.1.5-2.dsc
 68031abba9f21ed58fceb394772cd002 9967236 editors optional libreoffice_6.1.5-2.debian.tar.xz
 aaee4b344f82aa21c347305a4023545e 42443 editors optional libreoffice_6.1.5-2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=lP31
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: