On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 11:15:34AM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> > Note that if you also look for a home to keep those transitional
> > packages, we can also build them within lo-dicts (we would drop them
> > after buster, which also means after ubuntu 18.04, so everything's
> > great).
Well, of couse yesterday I was drunk and messed up the timing. Of
course for ubuntu we would be looking at 20.04 at this point, well after
the buster release. But I trust future me to not mess that up :)
> > But from what I can see the source packages you mentions in this bug
> > report are building something else anyway, so I guess they can also keep
> > building those transitional packages.
>
> Thanks for the info, I did not find the relevant part in helper.py.
Maybe because those are handled more "manually" in control.in :)
> There is one package (hunspell-sv) where that is desirable, since it will
> only contain transitional packages hunspell-sv-se and myspell-sv-se, so
> I think it is better if hunspell-sv-se transitional package is created
> from lo-dicts itself.
>
> Regarding myspell-sv-se transitional package, it was created back in 2011,
> so I think is safe not to worry anymore about it.
I took over both, as myspell-sv-se seems to have several reverse
dependencies still around, maybe you could look at that and file bugs?
> I will ask for old hunspell-sv removal afterwards,
so no need anymore, it will be marked as obsolete source and be removed
as cruft.
> Apart from the above, I think nothing else is needed.
Alright, I added transitional packages for myspell-sv-se and
hunspell-sv-se, tweaked the versioning of Breaks/Conflicts and uploaded
:)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature