Re: [dev] Somethhing failed with rsclexx.h
Hi,
I see you are building unxlngppc.pro which is PPC Linux.
Not all of the patches you need to successfully build PPC Linux version of
OOo are in the tree. I have committed most of them but some are still
waiting to be committed or just slipped through the cracks. This includes
the mozilla addressbook stuff, proper jdk identification during
installation, workaround for compiler optimization bugs in connectivity,
etc.
I would be happy to post a diff from my OO641C tree to the official one.
Just let me know if you are interested.
Kevin
On February 21, 2002 10:11, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> Hi Ken ...
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 09:25:09PM +1100, Ken Foskey wrote:
> >> ../../unxlngppc.pro/obj/rsclex.o: In function `parser(RscFileInst
> >> *)': ../../unxlngppc.pro/obj/rsclex.o(.text+0x1304): undefined
> >> reference to `yyparse(void)' ../../unxlngppc.pro/obj/rsclex.o: In
> >> function `MacroParser(RscFileInst &)':
> >> ../../unxlngppc.pro/obj/rsclex.o(.text+0x1408): undefined reference
> >> to `yyparse(void)' ../../unxlngppc.pro/obj/rsclex.o(.got2+0x3c):
> >> undefined reference to `yylval'
> >
> >cd rsc
> >rm -rf unxlngppc.pro
> >build
>
> Hmm ok, the problem is, that I try to build OpenOffice from a script to
> package it for debian... is it possible to remove rsc/unxlngppc.pro
> before rsc will build?
>
> Ahh I see... it is not possible
>
> >This will force a total rebuild in the rsc directory. The problem is
> >that the unxlnppc.pro/inc/rscyacc.yxx is created as header code using
> >the old version of the makefile.rc and the new version will not remake
> >it because the date stamp is newer than the source file (cant remember
> >off the source filename the top of my head).
>
> If I unstood it right, is there a source-code-file, which is newer
> than the makefile.rc? Can you remember, which one under rsc?
>
> >You may get further problems. Take look for rsc problems showing up
> > on the list currently, I beleive these are related.
>
> I will hope, that this will not become true. If I come into new trouble,
> I will post it here :)
>
> Regards
>
> Jan
Reply to: