Re: "weird" naming convention for ocamlbuild executables
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:42:12 +1000, skaller wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 14:32 +0200, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
> > I would also like that parallel installation of ocaml (to ensure
> > correctness of dependencies, and maximize availability of packages).
>
> What is required is a virtual package mechanism, something like:
>
> 1. Concrete packages for ocaml-3.09, ocaml-3.10 .. etc
> which do not conflict.
>
> 2. A single virtual package ocaml-latest which choses the
> latest ocaml.
>
I'm not sure what you want to do with this. As far as I'm concerned,
having two upstream versions of ocaml at the same time in a suite is
something I'd really like to avoid (same for all other packages,
really).
Cheers,
Julien
Reply to: