On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 16:58 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> We would use the Arg module, as defined at :
> http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/libref/Arg.html
<snip>
> not sure if this would be enough, but it is already a first step.
I've adapted the install.ml file to use this idea and adapted the
packaging similar to how advi does things. I would appreciate it if
someone on thi slist had time to review my packaging to make sure I've
done things right:
dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mtasc/mtasc_1.12-1.4.dsc
I get some linda warnings:
With native version:
W: mtasc; A binary links against a library it does not use symbols from
This package contains a binary that links against a library that is
not in the Depends line. This may also be a bug in the library which
does not have a shlibs file.
With the bytecode version:
E: mtasc; Binary /usr/bin/mtasc contains unneeded section comment.
This binary or shared library is not completely stripped. It contains
the unneeded section .note, or .comment.
W: mtasc; A binary links against a library it does not use symbols from
This package contains a binary that links against a library that is
not in the Depends line. This may also be a bug in the library which
does not have a shlibs file.
E: mtasc; Binary /usr/bin/mtasc is not stripped.
The binary shown is not stripped, and is included in a standard
package, while Policy shows that it should be stripped.
Any idea how to fix these?
Incidentally, is there a dh_ocaml script, similar to dh_python, which
would change the dependencies, allow a ${ocaml:Depends}, prevent
stripping of the bytecode and add appropriate linda/lintian overrides?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part