[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Laurent.Bonnaud@inpg.fr: Bug#192131: ocaml: postinst fails with xemacs]



En réponse à Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>:

> > But even when there is a problem with this mode shipped _inside_
> ocaml
> > would mean a new ocaml upload anyway.
> 
> Yes, exactly what i was saying, if it requires a new upload anyway,
> there is no gain in complicating things and shipping the ocaml mode in
> an extra package.

But I don't remember whether you package is able to byte-compile the
ocaml-mode at install-time since ocaml doesn't depend on Emacs.
Since the debian directory contains emacs related files, I think
it does, doesn't it? 

> > I think it would be a good idea. And even a better idea for you
> since
> > you are not an Emacs user.
> 
> :)))
> 
> Altough i suppose that uploading a new ocaml with a patch applied
> doesn't cost much anyway.

Of course.

> > Are there any Ocaml users using this ocaml mode rather than the
> > Tuareg mode ?
> 
> I think this mailing list is to restricted a forum to answer this
> question. The ocaml mode is the standard shipped by upstream, so i
> suppose the ocaml team at least use it.

Yes, but they don't use Debian and they use ocaml from CVS :P 

Cheers,

--------------
Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@free.fr>



Reply to: