[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: other META: lablgl, lablgtkgl, ...



On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 11:20:58AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> The only reason for doing this a hacky workaround to the too big META
> files. If you want to know, i would simply copy the lablgtk

No, this is not the reason!, the reason is that you have to factorize a
piece of software (lablgtkgl) which depends on lablgl while the rest of
lablgtk does not depend on lablgl.

If you keep on having a single findlib package for lablgtk you have to
impose a global dependencies from lablgtk to lablgl, this has nothing to
do with META file size.

> > Maybe, but please speak of this approach with the upstream author, not
> > with me ;)
> Mmm, he is subscribed to this list, is he not ? I have not much time for

I suppose not ...

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli  -  Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it}  -  http://www.bononia.it/zack/
"  I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!  " -- G.Romney

Attachment: pgp1DxZDiS1OU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: