Re: Cameleon packages almost done

[Jérôme Marant <marant.logatique@fr.thalesgroup.com>]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 03:44:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 03:28:29PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 03:32:47PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > 
> > > This leaves more flexibility to the user, and would allow to do a
> > > binary:all package build even on a native code supporting arch.
> > 
> >   Which is only true for libraries. It isn't for binaries since
> >   standalone byteocde programs embed the bytecode interpreter
> >   which is architecture dependent.
> 
> ???
> 
> I don't understand you.
> 
> The idea is to build one package arch: all which you build with the
> bytecode compiler (and without the -custom flag). The resulting
> executables will be /usr/bin/ocamlrun script, as can be seen with the
> ledit package for example :
> 
> $ file /usr/bin/ledit
> /usr/bin/ledit: a /usr/bin/ocamlrun script text executable

Is it standalone or does it need to have ocaml installed
(providing /usr/bin/ocamlrun)?

-- 
Jérôme Marant