Re: Cameleon packages almost done

[Sven Luther <luther@lambda.u-strasbg.fr>]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:24:06PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:22:59PM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> >  
> > > > Hum, yes, but not for all. For example, cameleon native and bytecode versions differ because the bytecode version allows the plug-in loading, but native version is faster. For tools where native and byte code versions do the same, I agree that I should only compile byt OR native. I'll do this in the future.
> > > > But keeping bytecode AND native is good, isn't it ?
> > > 
> > >   If there aren't any good reason for keeping both, users won't understand.
> > >   Are cameleon binaries the only ones to behave differently in Cameleon?
> > >   (BTW, what binaries from the cameleon directory behave a different way?)
> > 
> > Excuse me, i forgot a part of the sentence :
> > But keeping bytecode AND native *FOR LIBRARIES* is good, isn't it ?
> > 
> 
>   This is _way_ different :) I strongly agree with you about libraries.

For libraries, you have to ship both, i think the policy says this, but
i am not sure, will check.

Friendly,

Sven Luther