Endorsing Jeremy Paul Arnold Sowden's key 8790309C15658B33994ECA9A4E142C216BDFC613
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
For nm.debian.org, at 2023-12-20:
For the past 36 months, I have worked with Jeremy Paul Arnold Sowden on a number of netfilter-related Debian packages.
For this past work, Jeremy Paul Arnold Sowden sent mails using the email address jeremy@azazel.net
which is the one they're using on nm.debian.org, and they signed their work and
email using a GPG key with fingerprint 8790 309C 1565 8B33 994E CA9A 4E14 2C21 6BDF C613.
I've made sure that they are able to decrypt encrypted messages sent to this key
and that they're able to sign messages with the same key.
Due to the long-term interactions we had, I'm convinced that Jeremy Paul Arnold Sowden as they
present themselves on nm.debian.org is the rightful owner of both email
jeremy@azazel.net and GPG key 8790 309C 1565 8B33 994E CA9A 4E14 2C21 6BDF C613.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=bW1D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Arturo Borrero González (via nm.debian.org)
For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/fprs/person/azazel/8790309C15658B33994ECA9A4E142C216BDFC613/endorsements/view/
--
https://nm.debian.org/fprs/person/azazel/8790309C15658B33994ECA9A4E142C216BDFC613/endorsements/view/
Reply to: