Graham Wilson <bob@decoy.wox.org> writes: > i frequently see in am summaries that am's ask prospective developers to > package something without debhelper. why is this? > is it because it would take more skill to make a package without > debhelper? A Developer should be able to do it without. One should know what happens behind dh_*. And yes, it takes a bit more skill but thats not the main reason. Noone requests to maintain the package without dh_* after that. I often get package versions like X.Y-1.nm because they are only done for NM. Package is normally maintained with dh_* (I often check that before i request the dh-less version). -- bye Joerg #debian.de @ OFTC (01:38) <michael> hui, hier wird sonntags gechattet :) (01:39) <maxx> ja, aber nur zwischen 1:35 und 1:45, wenn der Sonntag der 1. im Monat ist :) (01:39) <Sahneschnitter> wasn hier los? activity :)
Attachment:
pgpJPCeSDxMF4.pgp
Description: PGP signature