[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: create_0.1.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED



On 11013 March 1977, Daniel James wrote:

>> The package name is a little bit too generic - "create".
>> And yes, even if its upstreams name (a very bad name selection looking at its
>> contents).
> How about 'creative-resources' for a package name?

Thats way better, and also fits more for what is in.

-- 
bye Joerg
<liw> we have release cycles, that's why it takes so long to get a
release out; if we had release race cars, things would go a lot faster

Attachment: pgpyXQG9pH7jW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: