|
Hi, Pierre Gruet: Thanks for your kind advice. > I think it is really fine to care for this package now, but as we are in
> the soft freeze period, I would upload to experimental: I used
> japi-compliance-checker to see the differences between the jars in
> version 4.2-1 and in (your candidate) 4.4-1, and there has been a small
> number of (upstream) return types changes. The number of
> reverse-dependencies is too large to be tested with ratt at home. All the warnings are solved and please see Upload #3. But for the ratt, it’s really a headache for me too. Could I leave it for the Debian CI ? Please tell me if there are any issues still need to be fixed. Best ! |