Your message dated Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:36:39 +0000 (UTC) with message-id <[🔎] 170559703.4473042.1467794199458.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line symbols file handling Was: Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor has caused the Debian Bug report #829692, regarding RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 829692: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829692 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor
- From: Nicolas Braud-Santoni <nicolas@braud-santoni.eu>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:59:59 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20160705115959.GA20248@harbard>
X-Debbugs-CC: codehelp@debian.org Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU to the package libu2f-host. * Package name : libu2f-host Version : 1.1.2-0.1 Upstream Author : Yubico AG * URL : https://developers.yubico.com/libu2f-host/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : utils The upload fixes issues with the copyright file and symbol versionning, and includes the latest upstream version (1.1.2). It builds those binary packages: libu2f-host-dev - Development files for the U2F host C library libu2f-host libu2f-host0 - Universal 2nd Factor (U2F) host communication C Library u2f-host - Command line tool to do Universal 2nd Factor (U2F) operations To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libu2f-host The proper maintainer of the package seems unresponsive, and 2 RC bugs (FTBFS) were previously fixed by codehelp and myself after sitting without acknowledgment for a month. Thanks a lot to codehelp for teaching me how to handle symbol files properly. Best, nicooAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>, <829692-done@bugs.debian.org>, debian-mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: symbols file handling Was: Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor
- From: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:36:39 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <[🔎] 170559703.4473042.1467794199458.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20160706000519.GA31364@angband.pl>
- References: <[🔎] 20160705115959.GA20248@harbard> <[🔎] 20160706000519.GA31364@angband.pl>
Hi, >Appears to be good, uploaded. >Thanks for your work! thanks for sponsoring, I looked at the package, but I didn't have time to look properly at it and reply here :) I admit I'm a little bit lost on this change (my fault! to be clear, this is why I'm redirecting to -mentors mail list) all the symbols have been updated: e.g. [snip] - u2fh_check_version@U2F_HOST_0.0 0.0 + u2fh_check_version@U2F_HOST_0.0 1.0 [snip] what does this mean? do reverse-dependencies needs a rebuild then? reverse-depends -b libu2f-host-dev Reverse-Build-Depends ===================== * pam-u2f I admit, I don't have a strong knowledge, so I ask: adding symbols should be fine because there aren't ABI changes that breaks reverse-dependencies, but changing the version on a current symbol does mean that the symbol changed and then they need a rebuild? thanks for sponsoring, I hope I'll lean something new from this RFS thanks :) G.
--- End Message ---