Re: Plink2 (Was: Bug#771154: plink: New major upstream version of plink)
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 09:43:52AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I completely agree. Regarding the "plink" program provided by the "putty"
> package, the simplest is to just make the "plink" packages conflict against
> "putty" and use /usr/bin/plink.
I strongly disagree (as in past discussions). Its a) against policy and
b) the assumption that biologists will not need putty is wrong.
> This is what "parallell" does against
> "moreutils" for instance.
There is no point in repeating an error done by somebody else.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: