[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Source code for SOAPdenovo available?



hey guys, I have to hand it to the soap denovo people. Ruibang Luo
<luoruibang@genomics.org.cn> actually spent some of his precious time
to help me out at KAUST, where we have a pretty peculiar setup: Power7
series with 512GB of RAm and ugh, RHEL 5.4. It would be godsend if
they would publish the binary on their site or published the code on
their site.

still, A+ for their willingness to help us out. :)

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing on behalf of the Debian Med project which tries to assemble
> Free Software for bio-medical research in a ready to install form inside
> the Debian GNU/Linux system (and thus as a consequence into Ubuntu).  A
> colleague of mine started using SOAPdenovo and thus I'm considering it
> a good target for including it into Debian.  When reading the homepage[1]
> I see
>
>  "Only precompiled binary version available now."
>
> The question is: If the source is not available NOW, do you have any
> plans for the future?   Will you possibly release the source code under
> a license which would enable us packaging it for Debian?  Any free
> license (like GPL, BSD or something like this) would be really great.
> If you would consider to provide the source under a free license we hope
> to be able ti make your program even more popular in the bio-medical
> researchers world because Debian and its bio-medical derivatives seem to
> become more and more interesting by assembling a useful set of tools
> which covers all workfields in Biology.
>
> Kind regards
>
>        Andreas.
>
> [1] http://soap.genomics.org.cn/soapdenovo.html
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20110211140353.GC9160@an3as.eu">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20110211140353.GC9160@an3as.eu
>
>


Reply to: