On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 05:42:11PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > What approach would you suggest to make users aware that such packages do > not have security support, through default 'check-security-support'? that's a tricky question, I'll pass for now... however I want to respond to the other part of the mail: > stretch however doesn't report the 3 packages I mentioned in my initial > mail. Should we fix it now? because the packages are not listed in sec-support.ended9? if so, sure, please add them, first to the master branch and then cherry pick those into the stretch branch. (and probably buster too). -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature