Am Freitag, dem 10.09.2021 um 15:46 +0200 schrieb Bill Allombert: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 02:41:20PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > And once again: What is the sense and what right do we have to remove > > donation > > requests just because they use icons of paypal/patreon/github/whatever > > which we > > cannot distribute? > > If upstream cannot be bothered to provide a DFSG-compatible donation > document, one can just replace it by an explicit link to the page on its > website. Users need an internet connection to make a donation in any > case. What are you talking about? How is such a donation link not DFSG compatible and how does it violate the DFSG? Daniel -- Regards, Daniel Leidert <dleidert@debian.org> | https://www.wgdd.de/ GPG-Key RSA4096 / BEED4DED5544A4C03E283DC74BCD0567C296D05D GPG-Key ED25519 / BD3C132D8B3805D1808123AB7ACE00941E338C78 https://www.fiverr.com/dleidert https://www.patreon.com/join/dleidert
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part