Bug#904420: lintian: Warn about empty fields in source package control files
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.93
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
I just encountered a source package with
Vcs-Browser:
Vcs-Git:
(Vcs-Browser: has only whitespace, and Vcs-Git: is empty). This seems
like something lintian should complain about.
This is related to, but I think simpler than #879809
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.16.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_CA:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.31.1-1
ii bzip2 1.0.6-8.1
ii diffstat 1.61-1+b1
ii dpkg 1.19.0.5+b1
ii file 1:5.33-3
ii gettext 0.19.8.1-6+b1
ii intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.4
ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.34
ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.60-1
ii libclass-accessor-perl 0.51-1
ii libclone-perl 0.39-1
ii libdpkg-perl 1.19.0.5
ii libemail-valid-perl 1.202-1
ii libfile-basedir-perl 0.08-1
ii libipc-run-perl 20180523.0-1
ii liblist-moreutils-perl 0.416-1+b3
ii libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.2.0-12
ii libtext-levenshtein-perl 0.13-1
ii libtimedate-perl 2.3000-2
ii liburi-perl 1.74-1
ii libxml-simple-perl 2.25-1
ii libyaml-libyaml-perl 0.69+repack-1
ii man-db 2.8.3-2
ii patchutils 0.3.4-2
ii perl [libdigest-sha-perl] 5.26.2-6
ii t1utils 1.41-2
ii xz-utils 5.2.2-1.3
Versions of packages lintian recommends:
ii libperlio-gzip-perl 0.19-1+b4
Versions of packages lintian suggests:
pn binutils-multiarch <none>
ii dpkg-dev 1.19.0.5
ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.72-3+b2
ii libtext-template-perl 1.53-1
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=/st/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: