[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[lintian] 01/02: Add missing "contains" verb to the description of the debhelper-autoscript-in-maintainer-scripts tag.



This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

lamby pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lintian.

commit 23d40961b15f291f8d76fbc4cec0ae658b02537e
Author: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Date:   Sat Jul 22 10:36:22 2017 +0100

    Add missing "contains" verb to the description of the debhelper-autoscript-in-maintainer-scripts tag.
---
 checks/scripts.desc | 4 ++--
 debian/changelog    | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/checks/scripts.desc b/checks/scripts.desc
index 8b0a849..90e4be3 100644
--- a/checks/scripts.desc
+++ b/checks/scripts.desc
@@ -729,8 +729,8 @@ Info: Lintian has detected the presence of a #DEBHELPER# token in the
 Tag: debhelper-autoscript-in-maintainer-scripts
 Severity: classification
 Certainty: possible
-Info: The maintainer scripts of the package one or more auto-generated
- shell snippets inserted by the listed debhelper tool.
+Info: The maintainer scripts of the package contians one or more
+ auto-generated shell snippets inserted by the listed debhelper tool.
 
 Tag: new-package-should-not-package-python2-module
 Severity: normal
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 9782aa6..74c5b55 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ lintian (2.5.52) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
       to make the justification clearer.
     + [CL] Check for calls to dpkg-statoverride --add without a
       corresponding --list.  (Closes: #652963)
+    + [CL] Add missing "contains" verb to the description of the
+      debhelper-autoscript-in-maintainer-scripts tag.
   * checks/rules.desc:
     + [CL] Clarify wording in debian-rules-parses-dpkg-parsechangelog to
       make the justification clearer.  (Closes: #865882)

-- 
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git


Reply to: