[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#632550: lintian needs newer debhelper



On Mon, 04, Jul, 2011 at 01:06:44AM +0200, Jakub Wilk spoke thus..
> * Mark Hymers <mhy@debian.org>, 2011-07-03, 14:37:
> >Commit 1f2f20b9973bbea25f10372f5d951216f7379fbe added build-arch
> >support to debian/rules which cases a FTBFS with debhelper
> >versions older than 8.1.0 (noticed when backporting to squeeze).
> 
> Huh? 1f2f20b9973bbea25f10372f5d951216f7379fbe added just two targets
> that are currently not used by any tool[0]. I can't see how it could
> possibly affect buildability of lintian.

Ah sorry, it wasn't that commit after all (I did wonder).  It was probably
8ad611e557ffbeda7ec4e86480ff0218a23f68bd which causes some of the test packages
to build using dh build-arch:

rules-build-dep-pattern: make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/lintian/debian/tests/rules-build-dep-pattern/rules-build-dep-pattern-1.0'
rules-build-dep-pattern: dh build-arch
rules-build-dep-pattern: dh: Unknown sequence build-arch (choose from: binary binary-arch binary-indep build clean install)
rules-build-dep-pattern: make[1]: *** [build-stamp] Error 9
rules-build-dep-pattern: make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/lintian/debian/tests/rules-build-dep-pattern/rules-build-dep-pattern-1.0'
rules-build-dep-pattern: dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

The dependency still needs to be on debhelper >= 8.1.0~ for that reason though
so the solution was right even if the reasoning wasnt.

Mark

-- 
Mark Hymers <mhy at debian dot org>

"Don't you hate those Claims Direct adverts?
 'I slipped on a banana skin and sued the Dominican Republic!'"
     Linda Smith on the News Quiz talking about the Compensation Culture



Reply to: