Re: lintian_2.3.2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Raphael Geissert <geissert@debian.org>]

Russ Allbery wrote:

> Raphael Geissert writes:
> 
>> Just one question: should I treat the "may not" of the newly added
>> triplet exception as a severity: important, certainty: possible? or why
>> was it phrased as "may not" instead of "must not?"
> 
> I think that was supposed to be must not.  I'd treat it as severity:
> serious, certainty: possible.  I'll raise that with the Policy list.

Ok, I bumped the severity of the tag.

Do you plan to make any change to 2.3.3?

I can fix a couple of bugs, maybe one wish or two, and release it tonight.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net